50 Channels UHF Professional Wireless Lavalier Microphone with Portable Transmitter-Omnidirectional DSLR Wireless Microphone for Interview YouTube Vlog Home Studio Field Recording(1TX+1RX)-ZHUOSHENG

The media could not be loaded.  This makes for a wonderful wireless solution for those looking to get started with shooting content. Let it be a new vlogger or someone shooting remotely for the first time that can’t afford some of those bigger brands.For their price, they sound pretty good, coming close to the Shure and Senn options we like to use. You can hear the difference, but the similarities are more than notable. Especially since the big name brands will cost around $600-$1200 per transmitter/receiver combo. So not only are you saving money, but you are sounding good right from the start. Making it hard to tell when all the viewer can see is the lav clipped to your shirt.User-friendliness isn’t an issue as the average user (with any technical experience) can figure out how to hook it up and manage their way through the few settings on the display without a sweat.You can switch between 50 pre-set channels on the transmitter and receiver. The description says 100 channels, but they might be referring to possible combinations if you are using two transmitters (if you bought an additional one). There is definitely only 50 channels to choose from though.The transmitter’s settings only include this setting (channel), outside of the low-cut which is controlled via the switch on the side. The receiver, you can change the channel, the output level to the headphone jack, and the output level to the camera (or other recording source). Then you have a switch on the side to swap between mix or stereo (if using two transmitters).We have been seeing more of these names pop up with wireless lav solutions, making for a wonderful dive into the world of comparing A vs B when it comes to new names vs popular brands (mostly thanks to the savings you gain out of the price tag). This option seems to be no different. A good price with pretty decent quality. So far in our tests, we haven’t run into any complications.**If you have found our review helpful, please vote it as helpful below so I know. This helps me provide quality feedback in the future.

I bought this for my iPhone X. It said I’d need an adapter. I bought it, and the mic doesn’t reach the phone. No matter what. I searched like crazy for directions online. No luck. Description says that with the adapter it will work. So I bought it. Doh. I need someSort of directions. As technologically advanced as I am, even I couldn’t figure it out. I think I’ll return.

I bought two sets of Pixel Mk-7microphones for my Canon SL-2 and they are a bit cheaper than these. They had good audio quality for my purposes (Youtube videos), but one set broke after 6 months and the other after two weeks! So, I bought this set and they do very well. Audio quality is good. There are a few more bells and whistles than the Pixel but my main concern is that they they hold up on my expeditions into the woods where I do my videos. So far so good after several months. It seems that the microphone connector (a week spot on the Pixel) is stronger and actually screws in, for a sturdier connection. Update 3/2020 - These microphones are much tougher than any others I've had. I put them through almost daily use. The screw in microphone plug is a key to its longevity compared to the Pixel and others. After constant popping recharged batteries into the plastic battery holder almost daily, one end finally gave way. The microphone still works, but batteries tend to pop out if you're not careful. No problem. A quick email to service and two new ones are on the way free. Highly recommended.

Occasionally, even with the foam cover on the mic, it'll record a burst of static, cut out for a few seconds, another burst of static, and then back to normal.I've played with the sensitivity in both my camera and the mics, same issue. And it happens on my cell phone as well, so I know it isn't my G7 camera.Too bad, because otherwise this works really well.

I am a film student, so I have the confidence of using lavalier, but this one. Since I am a poor film student, I can't afford a more expensive one. After doing some research and reading people's reviews, I decided to choose this item. Last time, one of my best friends asked me to film a church ceremony and I have to record the priest's speech. I was constantly monitoring the sound just because it is one of the most important aspects of a video. There comes a nightmare. Once in a while, about five minutes apart, there is a lousy noise that gets recorded. I thought it was my headphone at first then when I review my footages at home, they are there. Then I thought it might be there was some signal interference, I tested it again at home. The unacceptable noise came up again. It was very bad. I was hoping to return the item, but everything was too late.

The media could not be loaded.  Now let me start by saying it is not fair to compare these to true wireless systems (when they add a few bucks and features they get an improved name) because they have comple different functions in my opinion.First off, higher end systems include the more secure and available bandwidth of VHF as well as the common UHF. This kit (which came with all the necessary connection cords) transmits well and in my test didn't drop past 50' with the transmitter behind me.Aren't vhf channels better?Sure, but that comes at a cost and unless your budget is without restrictions you hardly notice the difference. Not including vocal performances color is added intentionally not accidentally through bad contacts.Are they perfect?Not for everything but for the cost you won't cry when you decide on another take just before a downpour.In short, I like these things (they are too new to love just yet but...) and they work well for my low tech high vis style? (Made it up but it my view right?).The end product is all that matters and these are part of my every day carry.*Edit*I had taken picture to upload but had forgotten to add them. After I saw how the video uploaded (it was in 4k) I decided to add them for better visuals.